Off-duty conduct: When private becomes public

Off-duty conduct: When private becomes public

Business, Human Resources

Author: Nicky Hardwock

Where does the boundary between private life and work life begin and end? For employers, this is not an abstract question but a practical challenge that arises more often than many realise. The simple truth is that private conduct is not always private, and in certain circumstances, it becomes an employment issue.

Recent events, such as the much-discussed “Coldplay controversy”, highlight how behaviour outside of the workplace can quickly spill into the public domain. What may have started as a personal choice or off-duty incident became a matter of public debate and, more importantly, a reputational risk for the employer.

The courts have long recognised this reality. In Edcon Ltd v Cantamessa and Others (2019), the Labour Court upheld the dismissal of an employee for racist remarks made on Facebook outside of working hours. Although the conduct occurred in a private capacity, it was publicly visible and directly associated with the employer’s brand and values. The case illustrates a vital principle: when private behaviour becomes public and undermines the employment relationship, employers may be justified in taking action.

The rise of social media has made these boundaries even more blurred. Platforms like Facebook, X, Instagram, TikTok, and whatever comes next are not private spaces. Even when employees believe they are speaking to friends or followers, the reality is that content can be shared, screenshotted, or amplified far beyond the intended audience. In the eyes of the public, and often the courts, employees remain representatives of their employers, even outside office walls.

This does not mean that employers can or should police every aspect of an employee’s private life. The law requires a clear link between the off-duty conduct and the workplace. That link may arise through reputational harm, a breakdown of trust, or the impact on workplace relationships. But once that link is established, employers are within their rights to investigate and, where appropriate, discipline.

For employers, the key lies in ensuring that policies are clear and employees understand them. A well-drafted code of conduct should spell out expectations around social media use, off-duty behaviour, and reputational risk. Training and awareness sessions can reinforce that “private” posts are not immune from workplace consequences. And when issues do arise, employers must act proportionately, following due process and ensuring fairness at every stage.

In the end, fairness is about balance. Employees do not surrender their personal lives when they accept employment, but neither can they expect their actions in the public eye to carry no consequences. Employers who respond fairly, consistently, and lawfully to off-duty misconduct protect both their businesses and their workplace cultures.

Email our team today for any HR-related queries you may have.